SOLVED:A proof of Theorem 3 based on the generalized pigeonhole principle is outlined in this exercise. The notation used is the same as that used in the proof in the text. a) Assume that ik ≤n for k=1.2, …. n^2 1 . Use the generalized pigeonhole principle to show that there are n 1 terms ak1, ak2, …, ak 1 with ii1=ik2=⋯=ihe 1 . where 1 ≤k1aki 1 for j=1,2, …, n. [Hint: Assume that ab,ikj, 1. which is a contradiction.] c) Use parts (a) and (b) to show that if there is no increasing subsequence of

What is the pigeonhole principle? - Definition, examples, and proof explained

Combinatorics & the Pigeonhole Principle

Answered: Problem 10. Pigeonhole principle applications. Be sure to justify your answer. 10(d) There are 14 3-digit numbers in a list. Can you conclude that there are two… | bartleby